Halloween is a day for costumes.
Halloween is about disguise.
People can't see behind the mask to divine among the wicked and wise.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
skip to main |
skip to sidebar
Beyond a certain point, everything becomes obvious, or does it?
Daily Read and Roll
- IP Blawg Search
- patent news -Gnews
- patent law -Gnews
- Patent News (Bing)
- The Software Reporter
- All-the-Top (patent blogs)
- More of Top IP Blawgs
- Yet more besties via Google
- Gene Quinn: IP WatchDog/blog
- ------===============------
- PTAB Reads --James Long
- CAFC Read Room (only DCT)
- CAFC Read Room (all)
- Patently-O
- New PTAB Open Data
- Old(?) BOPAI Read Room
- AIA (Bit Law 102)
- AIA ... (blogs, past month)
- -------------------------------------
- Anti-patent Tech Wrong Rants
- PTAB 103-2141
- WIPO tools
- Upturned Stones
- All Things Prosecution
- Ebert's IP Biz
- -------------
- -+-+--+-+--+-+--+-+--+-+-
- AllTop: Innovation
- AllTop: Patents
- =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
- AllTop tops
- Tech Dirt
"Patent" as a search term
News of Interest
Tools (Useful & unNovel Ones)
Recent BOPAI Decisions of Interest
About Me
- Step Back
- Primary interests are in global scale issues like Peak Oil & Global Warming. Why do their "eyes glaze over" when you try to tell them? Demise of science, logic and the US patent system is another area of interest.
6 comments:
Exactly.
Anon E. Mouse
Do you know of any proof that the method of the patent actually works? Or is it just an intellectual game, which someone happened to think they would fancy a patent for?
Is therea any real "smoothing of the transfer of energy commodities between sellers and buyers"? I'm not aware of much smoothiness: forest fires are in the news plus rolling and non-rolling black-outs.
Are there "real results" not only "affecting" but also solving "a real world problem"?
Or does the method of this patent result in paper pushing and cash transfers from rich-to-rich/poor-to-rich/rich-to-poor only? A make-work scheme: applications granted and denied, court cases decided and appealed; academic studies, news paper commentaries and blog posts written and read?
Stephan
Stephan,
Appreciate your sentiment.
There are many aspects of the legal world that are far from fair, like the fact that middle class folk can't afford lawyers & are stepped on every day.
That said however, the esoteric legal issue looked at in this "Bilski" post is whether the en banc Federal Circuit analyzed the Benson decision (an old Supreme Court decision) correctly.
The Bilski court relied on Benson to support their new ruling that a "process" is not "eligible" under 101 unless is "tied to a particular machine" OR it transforms an article into a different state or thing.
I'm merely pointing out here that claim 8 of Benson was "tied to a particular machine", namely, a reentrant shift register and the process of Benson claim 8 did transform an article (the register) into a different state (one holding a binary number as opposed to a BCD coded one).
I believe the CAFC did the best they could under the available Supreme Court precedent opinions. After what happended in KSR, I think the CAFC did well and this Supreme court mess has to be straightened out by the Supreme Court. Judge Newman has great points.
top [url=http://swedenonlinecasino.com/]blackjack[/url] brake the latest [url=http://www.casinolasvegass.com/]casino games[/url] manumitted no set aside perk at the chief [url=http://www.baywatchcasino.com/]casino online
[/url].
top [url=http://www.xgambling.org/]casino bonus[/url] check the latest [url=http://www.realcazinoz.com/]casino bonus[/url] manumitted no set aside perk at the chief [url=http://www.baywatchcasino.com/]baywatchcasino.com
[/url].
Post a Comment