Thursday, March 22, 2012

Genuinely Insignificant Thoughts from Genuinely Insignificant Minds

Prometheus Pic

SubTitle: Mayo v. Prometheus or How I stopped worrying and learned to love the Idiocracy)

(The above first link is to all things Mayo v. Promo (a Google search). This following link: here provides the decision in HTML accessible format as opposed to PDF format here: Mayo v. Promo. Left click on image at right to see list of Briefs filed before the US Supreme Court.) Click on summary bullet number to jump to section.

Not-BIO -DH Pic

Not Here Pic

It is the patriotic duty of an informed public to loudly protest when a governmental body, even the US Supreme Court, comes out with a Stinko-da-Mayo result such as this one.

Overview: Sadly, what this post will show is that:

• 1. The US SCt does not know, or intentionally misinforms on what a "patent" is (patents are not self executing monopolies),
• 2. The US SCt does not know, or intentionally misinforms on what function a "patent claim" is supposed to perform,
• 3. The US SCt does not know, or intentionally misinforms on what a "method step" is,
• 4. The US SCt does not know, or intentionally misinforms on what a "Law of Nature" is
• 5. ... (to be continued/updated)

(Left & Right barbed wire images will jump you Back & Forward in section numbers)

Why even care?
Because soon they will be hanging a new BANNER,
draped across the entrance to the SCt. Building:
(Not To Be Invented Or Discovered Here)

Bleed Finger Pic Indeed, a claim for "Barbed Wire" recites nothing more than Laws of Nature:

1) A ductile metal bent into shape retains its shape
2) If you bump into a sharp point, you will bleed

American inventors are being slowly bled to death by one unkind SCt. cut and then a thousand more like it: Benson, Bilski, Prometheus, ... and what is next?

Perhaps a blog post that sums up the situation most succinctly (for patent experts) is Patent Doc's lament: "We have met our 'Benson' and its name is 'Mayo' " (paraphrased). For more Patent Doc laments, see here

__________________________ Detailed analysis:

In the "Legal Universe", when the US Supreme court speaks, its words trump the very "Laws of Nature".

On the other hand, in the more humble world of "Science" (should you even be so lame brained as to believe in that most-obvious of "hoaxes" /sarcasm),

(1) Mother Nature always bats last,

(2) always bats first and

(3) is at bat throughout the almost-endless baseball game.

In that game, she often moves in a way that blocks scientists from seeing exactly how (or getting to understand exactly how) Mother Nature bats.

If lucky, they get a glimpse of the ball's trajectory after Nature has cracked her bat against it.

Then they go at it by making up stories, rules, abstract theories about what they think Mother was doing, how she was doing it and what she will do if confronted in the future with similar inputs. (The last part is called predictive modeling --calling the ball's trajectory even before Mother Nature bats its out of the ball park).

Mother doesn't care one owl's hoot about what the scientists' abstract theories say.

She does her thing irrespective of the noises the monkeys make amongst themselves.

Mother has no plans of coming down from the mountain top with stone tablets in hand, merely for the sake of proclaiming her "laws" to one tribe of monkeys or another. No one knows if her laws can even be expressed in a manner that the human mind can grasp. That possibility is one that Mother does not fret over.

Stepping boldly forward into this arena there come the "Magnificent Nine" (M9). These 'Wisdom-spewing' lords and ladies arrive gowned in black robes and steeped in learned chanting of laws of the 'legalized mind'.

They stare unblinkingly at Mother Nature as she stands in the batter's box. They throw their curve straight at her face, fully expecting Mother to step back and to show some humble deference before the awesome powers of the "Magnificent Nine" (M9). They utter legal-eagle incantations about Her "laws". They fail to see that she steps back not. Their curve balls vaporize into hot air before even coming close to Mother Nature's batting position.

Read more ... here Read the Supreme Court opinon itself by clicking the below: MAYO COLLABORATIVE SERVICES v. PROMETHEUS LABORATORIES, INC.


Anonymous said...

wow your site sucks more balls than mine.


Anonymous said...

Where are the Global Warming tags?

Step Back said...

That's right Anon, the Universe is flipped on its head and does cartwheels when one monkey tosses mud at the next monkey. That is the genuinely true "Law of Nature".

Keep the ad hominem attacks coming. We all love a good mud fight.

Anonymous said...

[p]Good [url=]chanel bags outlet[/url] ductility of the first layer of leather, a long 9 . Pearl Bailey [url=]cheap louis vuitton purses[/url] can do both the maintenance agents can also remove stains; olive oil can be used as a good choice for one of the purses and maintenance . (6) nowadays all kinds of bag models, often a composite of different materials, such as suede noodles, leather bag body and the like, cleaning should be dealt with separately; Also, if the bag decorated with rivets or metal buckles Material must also pay attention to the careful maintenance cleaner to wipe the metal, do not let [url=]cheap chanel bags outlet[/url] the metal rust destroy the overall beauty of the bag . Pure white bag can also use diluted of 84 disinfectant or bleach treatment, test a small area before [url=]chanel bags outlet sale[/url] use . The important thing is that you do a thorough research before choosing a specific store, as there are many sites you advertise cheap imitations . "
The Post subsequently published a separate online story reporting [url=]chanel bags outlet online

[/url] that Barhoum and his friend had been cleared: "The two men whose photos were being circulated internally among police have been cleared as authorities determined that neither man had any role in the Boston Marathon bombings . Step / methods [url=]louis vuitton purses sale[/url]
First, look at this is just a first layer of leather, but is somewhat different lines, on lines, the following figure is relatively small, it is because of the different parts of the cow Its skin is different, different lines, above the thin pores.[/p]